A settlement being discussed in an antitrust lawsuit against the NCAA and major college conferences could cost billions and pave the way for a compensation model for college athletes.
An agreement has not been finalized and many questions remain unanswered. It is also unclear if new rules could withstand further legal scrutiny, but it appears college sports is heading down a revolutionary path with at least some schools directly paying athletes to participate. Here’s what is known and what still needs to be figured out:
House vs. NCAA is a class-action federal lawsuit seeking damages for athletes who were denied the opportunity to earn money from use of their name, image or likeness going back to 2016. The plaintiffs, including former Arizona State swimmer Grant House, are also asking the court to rule that NIL compensation should include billions of dollars in media rights fees that go to the NCAA and the wealthiest conferences (Big Ten, Big 12, Atlantic Coast and Southeastern), mostly for football and basketball.
Related articles:
Related suggestion:
A group of Republicans has united to defend the legitimacy of US elections and those who run themAfghanistan's only female diplomat resigns in India after gold smuggling allegationsA candidate for Germany's key party was beaten up while campaigning for European electionsLondon, meet the new boss, same as the old boss. Mayor Sadiq Khan wins historic third termHome favorite Jannik Sinner withdraws from the Italian Open because of hip injuryLondon, meet the new boss, same as the old boss. Mayor Sadiq Khan wins historic third termIndoor climbing wall users may be breathing in toxic rubber dust linked to CANCERKate Hudson makes TV debut performing as singer on The Tonight Show Starring Jimmy FallonBritney Spears breaks silence after 'huge bustKim Kardashian flaunts her famous curves in barely
2.4249s , 6500.421875 kb
Copyright © 2024 Powered by Paying college athletes appears closer than ever. How could it work and what stands in the way? ,Global Genesis news portal