A settlement being discussed in an antitrust lawsuit against the NCAA and major college conferences could cost billions and pave the way for a compensation model for college athletes.
An agreement has not been finalized and many questions remain unanswered. It is also unclear if new rules could withstand further legal scrutiny, but it appears college sports is heading down a revolutionary path with at least some schools directly paying athletes to participate. Here’s what is known and what still needs to be figured out:
House vs. NCAA is a class-action federal lawsuit seeking damages for athletes who were denied the opportunity to earn money from use of their name, image or likeness going back to 2016. The plaintiffs, including former Arizona State swimmer Grant House, are also asking the court to rule that NIL compensation should include billions of dollars in media rights fees that go to the NCAA and the wealthiest conferences (Big Ten, Big 12, Atlantic Coast and Southeastern), mostly for football and basketball.
Related articles:
Related suggestion:
China Focus: CPC Continues SelfFull Text of Xi's Written Speech at APEC CEO SummitChina strengthens crackdown on illegal fishingXi Holds Talks with Mongolian PresidentXi Sends Condolences to Governor General of Solomon Islands over Strong EarthquakeNational Winter Games put incing on Olympic legacyChina, Indonesia Agree on Building ChinaWorld Leaders Mourn Passing of Former Chinese Leader Jiang ZeminXi Calls for Free, Open Trade at APEC Economic Leaders' MeetingPakistan investigating the shooting death of a suspect in the 2013 killing of an accused Indian spy
0.1797s , 6501.234375 kb
Copyright © 2024 Powered by Paying college athletes appears closer than ever. How could it work and what stands in the way? ,Global Genesis news portal